Overview

I work on a variety of issues in moral and political philosophy. My two most recent papers are about blame and about rights. I have also published on promising and am interested in normative powers more broadly. I have work in progress on ingratitude, blameworthiness, the value of persons, and relational morality.

Publications

Wrongdoer-Centered Reasons for Blame,” Ethics (2025) (PhilPapers) (pre-pub draft) (free early-view link)

I argue that we have reasons to blame wrongdoers for their own sake because blame is how we register the importance of their regard for others.

“Enabling Rights,” Australasian Journal of Philosophy (forth) (pre-pub draft)

I argue that our duties give rise to rights that function to protect our ability to do these duties, that we need not appeal to anything other than our duties to explain these rights, and that our duties are important reflections of our moral status or importance.

Conventionalism and Contingency  in Promissory Powers,” Philosophical Studies (2023) (PhilPapers) (pre-pub draft) (free, view-only PDF)

I argue that conventionalists about promising can and should accommodate a claim that is usually thought to make trouble for their view: the power of promise is morally necessary.

Promises, Intentions, and Reasons for Action,” Ethics (2021) (PhilPapers) (pre-pub draft)

I consider the view that to accept a promise is to intend the performance of the promised action and argue that this view makes it difficult to explain an essential property of promises: they provide reasons for performance.

Work in progress and under review

A paper on ingratitude (R&R)

I argue that the distinctive moral mistake of ingratitude is a failure to properly register the importance of the benefactor’s regard for the beneficiary.

“Directed Nonduties”

I argue that that directed duties are not the only kind of directed normative considerations.

“Quality of Will: Expression or Possession?”

I suggest that actions can express objectionable attitudes and evaluations that an agent does not actually possess, and that this might explain why guilt and resentment can be fitting in unusual cases—such as those involving apparent moral dilemmas—even in the absence of ill will.

“Participant Respect”

I sketch a previously ignored form of moral respect, “participant respect,” which requires us to recognize others as moral participants by publicly affirming the importance of their duties to others.

A paper on valuing persons

I argue some actions and attitudes (e.g., love, grief, and demands for apology) constitute valuing two people at once, each for their own sake, and do so in a way that suggests that the value of particular persons is in a deep sense interdependent on the value of others particular persons.

“Dignity’s Demands”

I argue that contemporary accounts of dignity—which associate it with entitlements—miss something important that traditional conceptions captured well: that dignity can manifest in the possession of obligations.